The aim of this blog is to encourage development and dissemination of knowledge of native protein structures at the quaternary level, that is, knowledge of the arrangements of subunits in functional proteins. The fundamental starting point of this discussion is that the arrangements seen in protein crystals are not necessarily the native arrangements.
Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Immunoglobulin Structure and Function in a nutshell
The two principal structures of immunoglobulins are now available in the Gallery. The trans form is the stable form in the absence of antigen, while the cis form is stable in the presence of antigen and complement. The two forms are quaternary isomers, differing almost only in the arrangement of subunits. It is now possible to give names to the various domains that suggest their shapes and functions. The word "elbow" is already used to describe the short flexible linking sequences between domains and the word "bridge" is already used to describe the longer flexible sequence in the middle of the heavy chain. These names can be retained. The light chain has two domains separated by an elbow of residues 104-109. Residues 1-103, previously named NL, can now be named "antigen jawL", while residues 110-214, previously named CL can be named "left-handL". The heavy chain domains can be similarly renamed (old names in parentheses): 1-111 "antigen jawH" (NH); 114-230 "left-handH" (CH1); 232-243 "bridge" or now possibly "latch"; 244-357 "right-hand" (CH2); and 365-478 "complement jaw" (CH3). Elbows are 112-113 and 358-364. The orientational relationship between a jaw and a left-hand is similar to that seen in the L chain of IgG2 (1YEF.pdb). Left hands clasp each other to form the antigen-binding complex, with the Complementarity Determining Regions on the inner surfaces of the jaws. Right-hands clasp right-hands to form the complement-binding complex. The switch between isomers involves four disulfide bridges exchanging partners, first the disulfides linking “left-hands” and then the disulfides in the “bridge”. This last exchange of disulfide partners may serve to lock the complement-binding domains into their binding conformation – hence the “bridge” may be better described as a “latch”. More work required!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment